|

Neither state aid nor trade barrier
The Court of Justice of the European
Communities backed Germany's Renewable Energy Law (REL) when it decided in a
dispute between two German utilities that guaranteed minimum prices for
electricity from renewable energy are not necessarily »prohibited« state aid.
|
 |
|
|
Many in the German electricity world were
anxiously awaiting a judgment from the European Court in case C-379/98, between
the German utility PreussenElektra (now part of E.on) and its subsidiary
Schleswag. On one hand, traditional electric utilities were hoping for an end to
the obligation to purchase electricity from renewable energies at guaranteed
minimum prices. On the other hand, investors in renewable energy power plants
feared that a negative outcome could lead to demands by the utilities for back
payment. All became clear on March 13, when the judges ruled in favor of the
renewable energy industry. »Finally, we have the legal basis for decisions to
invest in new PV factories and systems,« comments Carsten Körnig of the
Berlin-based industry lobby group Unternehmensvereinigung Solarwirtschaft (UVS).
And for Peter Ahmels, the president of the German wind energy industry lobby
Bundesverband Windenergie, the judgment »shows the behavior of the utilities
was purely a strategy of intimidation against green electricity producers.«
What was the case? The court of the German state
of Schleswig-Holstein, the Landgericht Kiel, sent a lawsuit from PreussenElektra
to the European Court of Justice in Oct. 1998. The utility had sued the local
electricity distributor Schleswag to recover 500,000 DM ($236,000 USD). This
represented part of the money that, in accordance with the German Feed-In Tariff
Law, the Stromeinspeisungsgesetz (StrEG), Schleswag had paid to producers of
wind turbine-generated electricity and then invoiced to PreussenElektra as the
neighboring transmission grid operator. PreussenElektra claimed that this
payment contravened European law, since it represented an »amended system of
state aid« that should have been but was not reported to the European
Commission.
In his summation last October, Francis Jacobs,
the European Court's advocate general, said that minimum prices are not state
aid within the meaning of Article 92(1) of the European Treaty, which says that
any aid granted through state resources in a form which distorts or threatens to
distort competition by favoring certain undertakings or products insofar as it
affects trade between member states is prohibited. But he did raise the question
of whether such regulations are compatible with Article 30, which prohibits all
national measures hindering imports from other Community member states (see PI
11/2000, p. 16).
So the first reaction of the wind and solar
industries after Jacobs' statement was one of relief, tempered with some nagging
uncertainty. From the perspective of the large utilities, a last hope for
victory remained in the battle over Europe's most successful funding model for
renewable energies. »The German electricity suppliers expect final
clarification of legal matters concerning federal funding of renewable energies,«
stated the web site of the German association of electricity companies, Verband
der Elektrizitätswerke (VDEW), on Oct. 26. It also pointed out that the Court
is not required to heed the advice of its advocate general.
Indeed, the judges didn't follow advocate
general Jacobs in everything, but not in the way VDEW had hoped for. In its
judgment, the Court not only refused to classify the StrEG as state aid, but
also was unable to find any reason to categorize it as an illegal intervention
restricting trade between the member states.
The Court explained that only those advantages
granted directly or indirectly through state resources are to be considered
state aid. But neither the legal obligation imposed on private electricity
suppliers to purchase electricity in accordance with the StrEG, nor the
financial burden for private electricity suppliers and the operators of upstream
transmission grids, constitutes a transfer of state resources. Even the fact
that this purchase obligation is imposed by law and confers an undeniable
advantage on certain undertakings is not capable of conferring upon it the
character of state aid in the meaning of the Treaty. »The current rules in the
electricity market do not preclude German legislation which imposes an
obligation to purchase electricity produced from renewable energy sources,«
says a Court press release. Consequently, the Renewable Energy Law (REL), which
succeeded the StrEG in April 2000, is not state aid either.
With regard to the subject of limiting trade
between the member countries, the Court declared that a national rule for higher
feed-in tariffs for renewable energies is indeed »capable, at least potentially,
of hindering intra-Community trade.« However – and this is really remarkable
– the Court, in its judgment, then referred to the Kyoto protocol and a number
of Treaty articles underlining the fact that environmental issues are priority
objectives of the European Community. Consequently, this goal has a higher value
than unhindered trade. So the StrEG, which aims to protect the environment by
contributing to the reduction of greenhouse gases, does not contravene the free
movement of goods in the current reading of Community law.
This judgment could affect other European
countries as well. »The decision of the European Court immediately and
effectively removes many of the fears that some other member states have
expressed about introducing such schemes,« says Murray Cameron, chief executive
of the European Photovoltaic Industry Association (EPIA). He adds that the »current
expansion of the PV market can only be sustained if other European markets
outside Germany are stimulated through the highly successful premium feed-in
tariff concept.«
The full judgement can be found at
www.curia.eu.int/en/jurisp/index.htm.
Click on »Recent case-law of the Court of Justice
and of the Court of First Instance« and enter
case No. C-379/98 as the search option.
Anne
Kreutzmann, Michael Schmela
© PHOTON
International, April 2001

|